District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2/21/1974
Smith v. United States
Citations
- 315 A.2d 163
- 1974 D.C. App. LEXIS 371
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “during the trial [an identification witness’] credibility and powers of recollection were fully tested throughout lengthy direct and cross-examination” and therefore that the evidence, if believed, was strong
- considering an “ample opportunity to observe” plus previous accurate pretrial identifications and trial judge’s evaluation that the witness’ testimony had “a ring of truth to it”
- referring to defendants as “killers,” “warriors,” “gangsters” did not rise to level of substantial prejudice
- no prejudicial misconduct where prosecutor argued “that a guilty verdict would be a matter of achievement and courage”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reilly, Fickling, Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-10-05· cited 211×
- Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-09-28· cited 150×
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-02-28· cited 99×
- Nelson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-12-30· cited 98×
- State v. GabrielSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-03-13· cited 95×
- Dixon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-10-18· cited 82×
- Powell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-01-24· cited 76×
- Arnold v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-06-18· cited 73×
- Parks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-09-14· cited 73×
- Montgomery v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-03-28· cited 70×
- Dyson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-08-23· cited 70×
- Sherrod v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-06-06· cited 70×
- Singletary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-02-24· cited 67×
- Robinson v. SariskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-01-07· cited 60×
- Ali v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-01-26· cited 59×
- Villacres v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-05-11· cited 59×
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-01-05· cited 57×
- Coreas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-10-24· cited 56×
- Coates v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-05-12· cited 56×
- Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-01-26· cited 55×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Melvin TelfaireD.C. Circuit· 1972-06-19· cited 477×
- Tyrone Gaither v. United States of America, Charles Tatum v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-04-24· cited 435×
- Walter Wynn, Jr. v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1967-11-16· cited 68×
- George E. Hill, Jr. v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1968-11-07· cited 44×
- Harold S. Cross v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1965-11-02· cited 42×
- Kenneth Jones v. United States of America, Willis Campbell, Jr. v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1964-10-15· cited 40×
- Allen v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1952-10-27· cited 38×
- Hall v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1948-12-20· cited 26×
- United States v. GoodmanSeventh Circuit· 1940-02-15· cited 23×
- Garris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1972-10-02· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.