Skip to main content
· 3/2/1974

Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

Citations

  • 519 P.2d 1101
  • 214 Kan. 128
  • 1974 Kan. LEXIS 311

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding affidavit based on juror confusion about instructions inadmissible under K.S.A. 60-441
  • trial court properly excluded juror’s affidavit that stated jury ‘instructions were not clear and were confusing to some of the jurors’
  • trial court properly excluded juror's affidavit that stated jury `instructions were not clear and were confusing to some of the jurors'
  • trial court properly excluded juror’s affidavit that stated jury “instructions were not clear and were confusing to some of the jurors”
  • trial cotut properly excluded juror’s affidavit that stated jury ‘instructions were not clear and were confusing to some of the jurors’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fromme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.