· 3/2/1974
Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Citations
- 519 P.2d 1101
- 214 Kan. 128
- 1974 Kan. LEXIS 311
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding affidavit based on juror confusion about instructions inadmissible under K.S.A. 60-441
- trial court properly excluded juror’s affidavit that stated jury ‘instructions were not clear and were confusing to some of the jurors’
- trial court properly excluded juror's affidavit that stated jury `instructions were not clear and were confusing to some of the jurors'
- trial court properly excluded juror’s affidavit that stated jury “instructions were not clear and were confusing to some of the jurors”
- trial cotut properly excluded juror’s affidavit that stated jury ‘instructions were not clear and were confusing to some of the jurors’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fromme
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.