District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 5/4/1973
Smith v. Tucker
Citations
- 304 A.2d 303
- 1973 D.C. App. LEXIS 280
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “[w]here the facts are in dispute, the existence of the facts [is] for the jury, but their effect, when found is a question for the determination of the court”
- discussing probable cause as mixed question of law and fact, while noting that, “[w]here the facts are not in dispute[,] the question of probable cause is one of law for determination by the court”
- “It is the duty of the court when the facts are in dispute to submit the question to the jury with the instructions that if they find the facts to be one way they amount to probable cause and if they find them to be another that they do not amount to probable cause.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Nebeker, Quinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Christopher G. Pitt, Sr. And Tela Hansom-Pitt v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2007-06-26· cited 148×
- Amobi v. District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsD.C. Circuit· 2014-06-27· cited 96×
- Leonard Hale, Individually and as Next Friend of Sean Lysher and Shanna Lysher Sean Lysher, a Minor Shanna Lysher, a Minor v. Scott KartSixth Circuit· 2005-01-13· cited 79×
- Smith v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-02-21· cited 62×
- Weisman v. MiddletonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-08-14· cited 58×
- May Department Stores Company, Inc. v. DevercelliDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1973-12-14· cited 55×
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. KellyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-07-01· cited 52×
- Ammerman v. NewmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-03-17· cited 50×
- Sherrod v. McHughD.C. Circuit· 2018-09-25· cited 39×
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2015-04-17· cited 29×
- Vessels v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-10-08· cited 28×
- Smith v. United States of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-08-14· cited 26×
- Neisner Bros., Inc. v. Ramos Ex Rel. DennisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1974-10-16· cited 15×
- Nichols v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1974-07-19· cited 15×
- Woodward v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-05-22· cited 13×
- Doe v. Safeway, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-01-28· cited 6×
- Pitt, Christopher v. DCD.C. Circuit· 2007-06-26
- Michael Doe v. Safeway, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-04-10
- Cousins v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia· 2014-08-15
- Hale v. KartSixth Circuit· 2005-01-13
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1973-03-14· cited 123×
- Shaw v. May Department Stores Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1970-08-14· cited 51×
- Prieto v. May Department Stores CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1966-02-01· cited 32×
- Cusick v. Second Nat. BankD.C. Circuit· 1940-09-23· cited 26×
- Chapman v. AndersonD.C. Circuit· 1925-01-05· cited 24×
- People v. WisecarverCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1944-12-07· cited 22×
- Shoemaker v. SELNESOregon Supreme Court· 1960-02-10· cited 22×
- Wolter v. Safeway Stores, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1946-01-28· cited 20×
- State v. HowlandSupreme Court of Kansas· 1941-03-08· cited 18×
- Viner v. FriedmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1943-08-03· cited 17×
- Stroman v. GilbertConnecticut Appellate Court· 1963-07-23· cited 8×
- Brooking v. LemonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1953-05-21· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.