Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 5/11/1914

Smith v. Texas

Citations

  • 233 U.S. 630
  • 34 S. Ct. 681
  • 58 L. Ed. 1129
  • 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1207

Syllabus

<p>Life, liberty, property and equal protection of the laws as grouped to-, gether in the Constitution are so related that the deprivation of any one may lessen or extinguish the value of the others.</p> <p>In so far as a man is deprived of the right to labor, his liberty is restricted, his capacity to earn wages and acquire property is lessened, and he is denied the protection which the law affords those who are permitted to work.</p> <p>Liberty means more than freedom from servitude; and the constitutional guarantee is an assurance that the citizen shall be protected in the right to use his powers of mind and body in any lawful calling.</p> <p>A State may prescribe qualifications and require an examination to test the fitness of any person to engage, or remain, in the public calling.</p> <p>While the State may legislate in regard to the fitness of persons privately employed in a business in which public health and safety are concerned, the tests and prohibitions must be enacted with reference to such business, and not so as to unlawfully interfere with private business or impose unusual and unnecessary restrictions upon lawful occupations. Lawton v. Steele, 152 U. S. 133.</p> <p>Arbitrary tests by which competent persons are excluded from lawful employment must be avoided in state regulations of employment in private business affecting public health and safety. Smith v. Alabama, 124 U. S. 465.</p> <p>The statute of Texas of 1909 prohibiting any person from acting as a conductor on a railroad train without having for two years prior thereto worked as a brakeman or conductor of a freight train and ' prescribing no other qualifications, excludes the whole body of the public from the right to secure employment as conductors and amounts, as to persons competent to fill the position but who have not the specified qualification, to a denial of the equal protection of the law.</p> <p>A'State cannot, in permitting certain competent persons to accept a specified private emp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If the service is public, the state may prescribe qualifications and require an examination to test the fitness of any person to engage in or remain in the public calling.”
  • “In so far as a man is deprived of the right to labor, his liberty is restricted, his capacity to earn wages and acquire property is lessened, and he is denied the protection which the law affords those who are permitted to work.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes, Lamar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.