Smith v. Texaco, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “materials that would be discoverable in possession of party do not become immune from discovery by being shared with attorney”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marshall v. Marshall (In Re Marshall)
  C.D. California· 2000-10-06· cited 12×
• Clover Staffing, LLC v. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc.
  S.D. Texas· 2006-12-06· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Nobles
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
• United States of America and Revenue Agents Clarence H. Isabel and John S. Reid of the Internal Revenue Service v. The El Paso Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1982-08-13· cited 262×
• United States v. Robinson
  Fifth Circuit· 1997-08-29· cited 85×
• Fred W. Shields and Joyce Shields v. Sturm, Ruger & Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1989-02-02· cited 80×
• Industrial Clearinghouse, Inc. v. Browning Manufacturing Division of Emerson Electric Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1992-02-21· cited 28×