Smith v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In dealing with sentencing we are not dealing with the Double Jeopardy Clause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• John Harvey Adamson v. James G. Ricketts, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-12-22· cited 192×
• State v. De Nistor
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 64×
• Dominguez v. Meehan
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-11-15· cited 20×
• State v. Darelli
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-07-31· cited 18×
• State v. Rutherford
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-10-15· cited 13×
• Williams v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-10-14· cited 12×
• State v. Hon. hancock/jennifer Ferrell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2015-04-07· cited 10×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-01-12· cited 7×
• Campas v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-01-10· cited 6×
• State ex rel. Polk v. Hancock
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-02-18· cited 4×
• State v. Geschwind
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-10-18· cited 3×
• State v. Wilson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-12-30· cited 2×
• State v. Nevell
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-05-17· cited 1×
• State of Arizona v. Bennett Laquan Williams
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2024-08-06

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Pearce
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
• United States v. DiFrancesco
  Supreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 1,657×
• State v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-05-14· cited 35×
• Lombrano v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-01-24· cited 17×