Skip to main content
· 11/26/1973

Smith v. Superintendent of Virginia State Penitentiary

Citations

  • 214 Va. 359
  • 200 S.E.2d 523
  • 1973 Va. LEXIS 314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, as a matter of law, there is an accord and satisfaction where the debtor delivers a check to the creditor with a note clearly communicating that the check is intended as full satisfaction of a disputed claim and the creditor negotiates the check
  • intent can be inferred by a creditor’s acceptance of a payment which he clearly understands was tendered as a settlement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carrico

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.