Skip to main content

Smith v. Suntrust Bank

Citations

  • 325 Ga. App. 531
  • 754 S.E.2d 117
  • 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 60
  • 2014 WL 128684
  • 2014 Ga. App. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • each alleged improper income distribution by fiduciary constituted a separate cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty
  • limitation period did not toll where party failed to exercise due diligence to discover breach
  • “As a fiduciary, a trustee is required to act for the benefit of the beneficiaries on all matters within the scope of their relationship,” and “must exercise the highest degree of good faith as to all matters connected with the property committed to their care.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Smith v. Suntrust Bank

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.