Smith v. Stephens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a challenged legislative act will be upheld under the rational-basis standard \so long as there is any reasonably conceivable state of facts that could provide a rational basis for\ the challenged legislative act (internal quotation marks omitted)
• stating that a challenged legislative act will be upheld under the rational-basis standard “so long as there is any reasonably conceivable state of facts that could provide a rational basis for” the challenged legislative act (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “When a challenged law does not infringe upon a fundamental right, we review substantive due process challenges under the rational basis standard.”
• “When a challenged law does not infringe upon a fundamental right, we review substantive due process challenges under the rational basis standard.”
• quot- ing PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing, 564 U.S. 604, 618 n.5 (2011)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).