Skip to main content
· 4/15/1884

Smith v. Steel

Citations

  • 81 Mo. 455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the subject legislation was not an unfunded mandate because although it prohibited the disposal of certain materials by a solid waste generator, it did not require any affirmative action by the local subdivisions that would necessitate additional local expenditures
  • \The primary consideration is the net effect of the program.\
  • “The primary consideration is the net effect of the program.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry, Sherwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.