· 4/15/1884
Smith v. Steel
Citations
- 81 Mo. 455
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the subject legislation was not an unfunded mandate because although it prohibited the disposal of certain materials by a solid waste generator, it did not require any affirmative action by the local subdivisions that would necessitate additional local expenditures
- \The primary consideration is the net effect of the program.\
- “The primary consideration is the net effect of the program.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henry, Sherwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.