Smith v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[f]ailure to argue a point [of law] constitutes an abandonment of it” and declining to address two claims that were included in the statement of points on appeal but not discussed in the brief (alterations in original
• “[F]ailure to argue a point . . . constitutes an abandonment of it.” (quoting State v. O’Neill Investigations, Inc., 609 P.2d 520, 528 (Alaska 1980))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).