Indiana Supreme Court· 3/27/2001
Smith v. State
Citations
- 744 N.E.2d 437
- 2001 Ind. LEXIS 273
- 2001 WL 290920
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that once a DNA profile is obtained, the owner no longer has any possessory or ownership interest in it
- stating that once a DNA profile is obtained, the owner no longer has any possessory or ownership interest in it
- stating once a DNA profile is obtained, the owner no longer has any possessory or ownership interest in it
- acknowledging a legitimate expectation of privacy in body and blood samples
- “once DNA is used to create a profile, the profile becomes the property of the Crime Lab. Thus, the defendant had no possessory or ownership interest in it”
- “[O]nce DNA is used to create a profile, the profile becomes the property of the Crime Lab[,] [t]hus, Smith had no possessory or ownership interest in it.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Rucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. EmersonOhio Supreme Court· 2012-11-01· cited 85×
- State v. HaugeHawaii Supreme Court· 2003-11-26· cited 75×
- Boroian v. MuellerFirst Circuit· 2010-08-12· cited 41×
- Willis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-12-30· cited 32×
- Garcia-Torres v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2011-06-30· cited 27×
- State v. NottiMontana Supreme Court· 2003-06-19· cited 22×
- State v. McCordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-04-22· cited 20×
- Varriale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-08-11· cited 17×
- Allen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-09-24· cited 14×
- Maloney v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-08-23· cited 11×
- A.B. Doe, a minor child by and through her parent(s) individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Jerome Adams, M.D., in his capacity as the Indiana State Health CommissionerIndiana Court of Appeals· 2016-04-19· cited 11×
- Herman v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-02-23· cited 10×
- Tyler J. Veerkamp v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2014-04-29· cited 7×
- Varriale v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-07-30· cited 6×
- A.A. v. Attorney GeneralNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-03-17· cited 6×
- State v. GlynnCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-09-14· cited 5×
- People v. RodriguezNew York Supreme Court· 2002-11-12· cited 5×
- Fortune v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-10-21· cited 4×
- State v. EmersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-02-10· cited 4×
- Sharp v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-10-25· cited 3×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 2,425×
- Moran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-12-12· cited 151×
- Peterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-13· cited 145×
- Callender v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1922-06-23· cited 83×
- People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-10-06· cited 55×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-07· cited 43×
- Bickley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-07-16· cited 38×
- Kleiman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-04-23· cited 11×
- Zitterbart v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-07· cited 9×
- Backman v. Packwood Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-07-16· cited 4×
- Tighe v. American Compressed Gases, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-02-17· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.