Smith v. State
Citations
- 112 Miss. 248
- 72 So. 929
Syllabus
<p>CRIMINAL Law. Variance. Objection. Waiver.</p> <p>Where an indictment charged defendant with stealing a cow belonging to several parties, but the evidence showed that it belonged to only one of them who died after it was stolen but before the indictment, leaving the other named owners as his heirs at law, the defendant in order to take advantage of the variance between the allegations and the proof should have objected specifically on that ground, whereupon under Code 1906, section 1508, the indictment could have been amended to correspond with the proof, and defendant failing to do this-could not avail himself of such variance on appeal.</p>
Judges: Pee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.