Smith v. State
Citations
- 55 Miss. 410
Syllabus
<p>Ceimimal Law. Practice. Competency of jurors. Conscientious scruples.</p> <p>S. was indicted for murder. In impaneling a jury to try his case, the court asked two members of the special venire if they had any conscientious scruples against the infliction of capital punishment, and each replied that he “would not like for aman to be hung,” The court then declared them incompetent for jurors, and discharged them, although the counsel of the accused requested that they should be further examined touching their conscientious scruples. Held, that the action of the court was erroneous.</p>
Judges: Chalmers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- Ronald Clark O'Bryan v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentFifth Circuit· 1983-08-30· cited 131×
- People v. DuenasCalifornia Supreme Court· 2012-08-06· cited 98×
- State v. MathisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1968-07-03· cited 63×
- Edwards v. ThigpenS.D. Mississippi· 1984-09-14· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.