Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It seems clear to us that the appellant was charged originally with common law larceny, and the question of whether this was petit or grand larceny became a matter of proof at the trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Spratt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-04-14· cited 15×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Corbin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-02-10· cited 78×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1874-01-29· cited 58×
• Melia v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-11-13· cited 34×
• Woods v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-03-07· cited 21×
• Farlow v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-05-27· cited 19×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-11-04· cited 14×
• Gyant v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-06-21· cited 8×