Smith v. State
Citations
- 64 Kan. 730
- 68 P. 641
- 1902 Kan. LEXIS 268
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Cities and City Oeeicers — Injunction—Confession of Judgment. The state, on relation of the attorney-general, brought suit against a city of the second class to enjoin its mayor and councilmen from making contracts involving an expenditure of money out of the general revenue fund in excess of the amount which the city was authorized by law to raise by taxation for general revenue purposes. Due service of summons was had on the city. At a regular meeting of the city council, at which a quorum of its members was present, a resolution was passed by a majority of the members confessing judgment in the suit and authorizing the city attorney to appear in court and confess judgment on behalf of the city, which was done. Held, that the judgment was valid and binding.</p>
Judges: Doster, Ellis, Greene, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Manley v. MayerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1904-02-06· cited 28×
- City of Haven v. GreggSupreme Court of Kansas· 1988-12-09· cited 24×
- Asher v. Hutchinson Water, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1903-03-07· cited 19×
- Equity Investors, Inc. v. Ammest Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1977-04-29· cited 13×
- Brooks v. National Bank of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1941-06-07· cited 4×
- Barnes v. HiltonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1952-01-26· cited 3×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court· 1882-12-18· cited 854×
- Rushville Gas Co. v. City of RushvilleIndiana Supreme Court· 1889-12-10· cited 57×
- State v. Washington Social Library Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1841-12-15· cited 56×
- Atchison Board of Education v. De KaySupreme Court· 1893-04-10· cited 44×
- Ten Eyck v. Pontiac, Oxford & Port Austin RailroadMichigan Supreme Court· 1889-02-15· cited 41×
- Smith v. Los Angeles Immigration & Land Co-operative Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-02-27· cited 24×
- Caley v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court· 1888-04-17· cited 18×
- First Municipality v. CuttingSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1849-05-15· cited 17×
- Coolbaugh v. RoemerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1883-06-04· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.