Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 291 Ark. 163
  • 722 S.W.2d 853
  • 1987 Ark. LEXIS 1913

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence of intercepted oral communication previously inadmissible did not violate the ex post facto prohibition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newbern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.