Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where contraband is within the exclusive possession of the defendant, knowledge of its presence may be inferred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-26· cited 22×
• Sinclair v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-01-05· cited 12×
• Charles Kevin Simpson v. U.S. Attorney General
  Eleventh Circuit· 2021-08-04· cited 10×
• M.G. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-05

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fotopoulos v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-10-15· cited 155×
• Bundy v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-06-21· cited 113×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-08-25· cited 102×
• Wale v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-04-29· cited 65×
• Crum v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-04-16· cited 34×
• Hill v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-12· cited 26×
• Kuhn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-09-27· cited 17×
• Jordan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-23· cited 14×
• Solomon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-07· cited 13×
• Wonyetye v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-28· cited 7×
• Chambers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-26· cited 6×
• Domis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-04· cited 5×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-08· cited 2×