Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 301 Ga. 348
  • 801 S.E.2d 18
  • 2017 WL 2414659
  • 2017 Ga. LEXIS 450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction of neglect under OCGA § 16-5- 101 (a) without referring to OCGA § 16-5-101 (b)
  • concluding that trial counsel did not perform deficiently by deciding not to request jury instructions on involuntary manslaughter and reckless conduct and by instead pursuing an all- or-nothing defense of accident, which was “based on his client’s account of the events”
  • no deficient performance where, based on defendant’s account of 25 events, counsel decided to forgo jury instructions based on alternative defense theory
  • “Decisions about which jury charges to request are classic matters of trial strategy.” (citation modified)
  • “Pursuit of an ‘all or nothing’ defense [generally] is a permissible trial strategy.”
  • The “[p]ursuit of an ‘all or nothing’ defense is a permissible trial strategy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.