Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 292 Ga. 588
  • 740 S.E.2d 129
  • 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 619
  • 2013 WL 1092662
  • 2013 Ga. LEXIS 261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the pattern charge given was not a presumption-of-truthfulness charge
  • finding that “[w]hile a court may not express an opinion as to what has or has not been proven, remarks made by the court regarding the admissibility of evidence or explaining the court’s rulings are not such a comment or opinion”
  • rejecting ineffective-assistance-of-counsel argument when defendant failed to “establish any prejudice as to counsel’s cross-examination” of witness
  • finding no error in giving of jury instruction tracking the language of former § 1.31.20
  • the trial court is allowed to “guide counsel” in order to ensure a fair trial
  • trial judge’s comment that witness was a “very thorough investigator” did not express an opinion that bolstered the witness’ credibility in violation of OCGA § 17-8-57

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.