Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that reversal was not required when the trial court received the jury’s verdict in the defendant’s absence, because his absence “was merely an irregularity” and “no matter of substance was involved”
• trial was at “an end when the jury made a verdict and separated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cawthon v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1904-02-12· cited 174×
• Wilson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1955-11-15· cited 82×
• Frank v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1914-11-14· cited 62×
• Chance v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1923-09-24· cited 39×
• Wanzer v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1974-07-02· cited 29×
• Champ v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-02-15· cited 20×
• Wells v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1902-08-07· cited 17×
• Daugherty v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1969-05-08· cited 6×
• Booth v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-05-03· cited 5×
• Weaver v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1934-11-23· cited 4×
• Anderson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1961-01-20

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Nolan v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1874-07-15· cited 11×