Missouri Court of Appeals· 6/30/1997
Smith v. State
Citations
- 948 S.W.2d 240
- 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1218
- 1997 WL 358604
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing movant’s Rule 24.035 motion as untimely when neither pro se motion nor amended motion revealed the date movant was delivered to the custody of the DOC
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crow, Montgomery, Parrish
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1989-05-16· cited 537×
- Jacobowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-10-02· cited 225×
- McCoo v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1992-12-23· cited 15×
- Lestourgeon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1992-09-29· cited 14×
- Suman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-02-06· cited 13×
- Newman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1984-04-20· cited 11×
- Phillips v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1996-06-20· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.