Smith v. State
Citations
- 80 Fla. 315
- 85 So. 911
Syllabus
<p>1. The term “dwelling house” in the law of burglary is defined as the apartment, building or cluster of buildings in which a man with his family resides.</p> <p>2. Words employed in a statute having acquired a fixed and definite meaning, it will be presumed, in the absence of any definition in the statute, that they were intended to be used in that sense by the Legislature.</p> <p>3. In order to uphold a conviction under the statute defining the offense and prescribing the penalty for breaking and entering a dwelling house, it must be alleged and proved that the dwelling house alleged to have been broken and entered was the dwelling house in fact of another at the time of the alleged breaking and entry.</p> <p>4. In order that a house may come within the common law definition of burglary it must be in fact the dwelling house of another at the time of the breaking and entry; and the same is true under a statute punishing the breaking and entering of a dwelling house. The character of the house is generally immaterial if it is occupied as a dwelling.</p> <p>5. Temporary absence of the occupant does not take away from a dwelling house its character as such,'but it must be made to appear that such occupant left the house animo revertencli in order to constitute an unlawful breaking and entry of the house during such absence burglary.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- relying on textbook definitions and courts of other jurisdictions to determine the meaning of a statutory phrase
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browne, Ellis, Taylor, West, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LoukWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-12-18· cited 73×
- People v. CardonaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-04-27· cited 33×
- STATE DEPT. OF BUS. REG. v. Salvation Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-22· cited 30×
- George Ralph James, Jr. v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1956-11-26· cited 29×
- Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-10-31· cited 26×
- State v. BeasleySupreme Court of Florida· 1975-07-30· cited 26×
- Reform Party of Florida v. BlackSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-09-17· cited 25×
- State v. FerebeeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-07-17· cited 12×
- Tukes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-06-07· cited 12×
- Byers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1988-04-05· cited 10×
- State v. BennettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-07-25· cited 9×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-06-21· cited 9×
- Perkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-12· cited 6×
- Stewart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1960-07-15· cited 6×
- Heikamp v. Succession of SolariLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1951-10-15· cited 6×
- P.P.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-03-23· cited 6×
- L.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-07· cited 6×
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-06-02· cited 5×
- Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1924-02-01· cited 5×
- Strader v. OakleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-02-18· cited 2×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.