Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “... courts will inquire, not into the name, but the game, to determine whether it is a prohibited game ... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Carroll
  California Supreme Court· 1889-08-05· cited 43×
• Hoffman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1949-04-01· cited 19×
• State v. Betti
  U.S. District Court· 1943-09-29· cited 5×
• G2, INC. v. Midwest Gaming, Inc.
  W.D. Texas· 2007-04-17· cited 3×