Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[S]eparate charges and convictions are not required to support a substantive violation of probation based upon the commission of a new law violation.\
• \[S]eparate charges and convictions are not required to support a substantive violation of probation based upon the commission of a new law violation.\
• “[O]nce' a circuit court has imposed a youthful offender sentence, it must continue that status.upon resen-tencing after a violation of probation or community control.”
• “[O]nce a circuit court has imposed a youthful offender sentence, it must continue that status upon resentencing after a violation of probation or community control.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jimmy Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-07-23· cited 22×
• Danny Lee Flagg v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-11-08· cited 6×
• DASHAUN BROOKS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-09-18
• McBurnett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-04-15
• McClendon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-03-20

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-31· cited 33×
• Christian v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-05· cited 29×
• State v. Arnette
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-08-27· cited 27×