Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 140 S.W.2d 675
  • 200 Ark. 767
  • 1940 Ark. LEXIS 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the writ was not available to afford relief on the ground that the principal witness against the accused had recanted
  • holding that the writ was not available to afford relief on the ground that the principal witness against the accused had recanted and that others since the accused’s conviction had confessed to the crime
  • holding that the writ was not available to afford relief on the. ground that -the principal witness against the accused had recanted and that others since the accused’s conviction had confessed to the crime
  • holding that the writ was not available to afford relief on the ground that the principal witness against the accused had recanted and that others since the accused’s conviction had confessed to the crime
  • holding that the writ was not available to afford relief on the ground that the principal witness against the accused had recanted and that others since the accused’s conviction had confessed to the crime
  • holding that the writ was not available to afford relief on the ground'that the principal' witness against the accused had recanted and that others since the accused’s conviction had confessed to the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.