Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 721 S.E.2d 892
  • 290 Ga. 428

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when reviewing trial court’s denial of motion for directed verdict, appellate court applies sufficiency oftheevidencetest
  • “We see no error in the trial court’s refusal to enforce the subpoena duces tecum in light of the trial court’s wide discretion in determining what evidence is relevant and material.”
  • “We see no error in the trial court’s refusal to enforce the subpoena duces tecum in light of the trial court’s wide discretion in determining what evidence is relevant and material.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.