Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 874 S.W.2d 720
  • 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 527
  • 1994 WL 81527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that any error in admission of officer’s testimony regarding results of field test was rendered harmless by chemist’s expert testimony that substance was cocaine
  • “Thus, although we give no probative value to [the officer’s] conclusion that because the cotton turned blue, cocaine was present, we do assign value to the remainder of his testimony.”
  • testimony about performance and results of field test is expert testimony
  • testimony about performance and results of field test is expert testimony
  • testimony about performance and results of field test is expert testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connor, Duggan, Hedges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.