Court of Appeals of Texas· 3/3/1993
Smith v. State
Citations
- 842 S.W.2d 401
- 1992 WL 346869
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- any possible error was waived by the State making the same argument, without objection, both before and after the contested portion of the argument
- any possible error was waived by the State making the same argument, without objection, both before and after the contested portion of the argument
- use of extraneous aggravated sexual assault at punishment hearing for capital murder conviction no bar to subsequent trial on the sexual assault
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farris, Meyers, Day
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Edwards v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-01-09· cited 84×
- Jones v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1995-05-10· cited 66×
- Richards v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1996-04-03· cited 59×
- Ex Parte BroxtonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-11-16· cited 56×
- Watkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1997-05-22· cited 25×
- Beasley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-11-10· cited 16×
- Perez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2011-08-24· cited 15×
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-11-18· cited 12×
- Ex Parte SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-11-02· cited 10×
- Parks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-07-21· cited 9×
- Broxton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-11-10· cited 4×
- Michael Andrew Foreman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2015-01-13
- James Floyd Wagner, III A/K/A Jim F. Wagner v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-01-09
- Krystal Rena King v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2007-05-31
- Ex Parte: Ronald Glenn SandersonTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1993-11-10
- Michael Thompson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1994-08-17
- Ex Parte Jack Warren DavisTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1995-02-08
- Ex Parte Jose GutierrezTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-03-11
- William C. Schilling v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2009-09-02
- Edwards, Michael Jerome v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-01-09
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 1,620×
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-01-17· cited 1,616×
- United States v. FelixSupreme Court· 1992-03-25· cited 537×
- Gaddis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-05-25· cited 445×
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-07-02· cited 405×
- Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-01-30· cited 285×
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Gary Bowdach, Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1977-11-28· cited 199×
- Denison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-05-04· cited 191×
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-04-11· cited 183×
- Hollins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-03-20· cited 131×
- Albiar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-11-04· cited 117×
- Menefee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-04-15· cited 88×
- MacIas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1989-11-22· cited 83×
- Freeport-McMoRan Inc. v. K N Energy, Inc.Supreme Court· 1992-02-24· cited 70×
- Ex Parte SewellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-10-07· cited 64×
- Haki Sekou A/K/A Robert Dominick v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryFifth Circuit· 1986-08-06· cited 48×
- State v. NashTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1992-01-29· cited 37×
- Sorola v. TexasSupreme Court· 1989-12-11· cited 29×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1958-02-05· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.