Supreme Court of Georgia· 6/28/2010
Smith v. State
Citations
- 697 S.E.2d 177
- 287 Ga. 391
- 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2086
- 2010 Ga. LEXIS 485
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[o]ther consequences that are also the result (sometimes even the automatic result) of guilty pleas can also be of enormous concern to certain defendants . . . [including, but not limited to] the impact of the criminal conviction on... sex offender registration....”
- unless defendant can show harm or prejudice from violation of USCR 33.8, requiring judge to inform defendant of potential immigration consequences of guilty plea, defendant is not entitled to withdraw guilty plea
- “As a matter of constitutional due process, before a defendant pleads guilty, the trial court must advise him of the ‘direct’ consequences of entering the plea, but not of all the potential ‘collateral’ consequences, in order for the guilty plea to be considered knowing and voluntary.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nahmias
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GarciaNebraska Supreme Court· 2018-12-14· cited 160×
- Nazario v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-07-11· cited 116×
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-04-24· cited 108×
- Collier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2019-10-21· cited 79×
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-10-15· cited 53×
- Blackwell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2018-01-29· cited 39×
- Bahtiraj v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-12-19· cited 29×
- Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-05-11· cited 28×
- Mims v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2016-06-06· cited 27×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-07-08· cited 25×
- English v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-12-16· cited 24×
- People v. GuzmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-02-09· cited 23×
- Tyner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-06-20· cited 22×
- People v. GuzmanIllinois Supreme Court· 2015-12-28· cited 21×
- Encarnacion v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2014-09-22· cited 17×
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2012-04-10· cited 11×
- Ferguson v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-03-25· cited 11×
- Winfrey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2018-06-29· cited 11×
- Kennedy v. HinesSupreme Court of Georgia· 2019-01-22· cited 11×
- Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2019-05-20· cited 11×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 7,191×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 2,182×
- United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court· 1979-05-21· cited 1,059×
- People v. DelvillarIllinois Supreme Court· 2009-12-17· cited 213×
- Kawakita v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1952-10-13· cited 140×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia· 1995-03-06· cited 117×
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2001-03-02· cited 87×
- Morrow v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1995-11-06· cited 61×
- Williams v. DuffySupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-03-01· cited 58×
- Grantham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1997-02-24· cited 53×
- State v. ZarateNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-09-27· cited 43×
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1998-12-04· cited 40×
- Britt v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia· 2001-11-19· cited 30×
- Coweta Bonding Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia· 1973-05-10· cited 27×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2006-06-26· cited 24×
- Parker v. AbernathySupreme Court of Georgia· 1985-01-07· cited 23×
- Stinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-02-08· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.