Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the focus is upon whether the recording taken as a whole, or a crucial segment thereof, is of such poor quality that it is likely to lead to jury speculation as to its contents”
• “the focus is upon whether the recording taken as a whole, or a crucial segment thereof, is of such poor quality that it is likely to lead to jury speculation as to its contents”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Clawson
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-09-23· cited 94×
• Lindley v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-10-07· cited 68×
• Battle v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-01-19· cited 54×
• Shepler v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1980-11-07· cited 43×
• Brown v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1991-08-29· cited 38×
• Andrews v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-11-03· cited 37×
• Fyock v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-06-29· cited 36×
• Coleman v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-07-25· cited 27×
• Brady v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1989-06-21· cited 22×
• Hampton v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1984-10-04· cited 22×
• Leavell v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1983-11-17· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Leveille
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-24· cited 15×
• Winningham v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-03-10· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Hashem
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-05-04· cited 12×
• Miller v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1986-10-23· cited 10×
• Hestand v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-10-26· cited 6×