Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that the State did not violate the APRA by providing the plaintiff with a summary of the requested documents when the plaintiff was incarcerated in punitive segregation and, as a result of this placement, it would have been impractical to allow him to inspect the requested records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ireland v. Shearin
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-20· cited 7×
• Smith v. Indiana Department of Correction
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-03-11
• John D. May v. Indiana Department of Child Services, Carrie T. Ingram, and Direnda Winburn (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-01-29

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Atlantic Coast Airlines v. Cook
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2006-12-06· cited 55×
• Smith v. Maximum Control Facility
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-07-13· cited 10×
• Holland v. Rizzo
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-08-28· cited 6×