Supreme Court of Delaware· 5/26/2010
Smith v. State
Citations
- 996 A.2d 786
- 2010 Del. LEXIS 236
- 2010 WL 2164516
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ―The trial judge should consider the defendant‘s background, experience, and conduct, and advise the defendant [of the eight factors].‖
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holland, Jacobs, Ridgely
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Morrison v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2016-02-25· cited 14×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2012-12-10· cited 10×
- Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2017-03-22· cited 2×
- State of Delaware v. Dubose.Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-11-04
- Ryle v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2016-10-11
- Mayfield v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2021-06-30
- State v. CooperSuperior Court of Delaware· 2023-07-31
- State v. CooperSuperior Court of Delaware· 2023-08-11
- Fry v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2026-03-02
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- United States v. Welty, John JacobThird Circuit· 1982-03-02· cited 263×
- Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1980-05-30· cited 167×
- Briscoe v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1992-04-23· cited 35×
- Stigars v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1996-04-01· cited 33×
- Hartman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2007-03-09· cited 19×
- Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-08-31· cited 10×
- Boyer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-11-16· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.