Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that as the length of time between the observation of the events establishing probable cause and the date of issuance of the warrant increases, “there is less likelihood that the items sought to be seized will be found on the premises”
• search upheld based on affidavit showing prior controlled buys, with last buy occurring 36 days before warrant issued

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pilieci v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-09· cited 26×
• State v. Vanderhors
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-19· cited 16×
• Montgomery v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-18· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Rice
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1999-08-18· cited 13×
• Denton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-05-06· cited 12×
• Gonzalez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-23· cited 11×
• Haworth v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-15· cited 7×
• State v. Singleton
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1993-06-01· cited 5×
• State v. Moise
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-31· cited 5×
• State v. Jenkins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-21· cited 5×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sgro v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1932-12-05· cited 657×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-06-26· cited 43×
• Hamelmann v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1959-06-25· cited 36×
• Hudson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-02-27· cited 19×
• Hess v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-03-07· cited 7×