Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• state was required to demonstrate amount of cost of prosecution and trial court was required to consider financial resources of defendant, for trial court to be authorized to enter judgment for the costs of prosecution against defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Reyes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-15· cited 332×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-01· cited 14×
• Gant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-27· cited 13×
• Norman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-15· cited 12×
• Tennie v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-19· cited 11×
• Wheeler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-13· cited 5×
• Graham v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-06· cited 5×
• Pickett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-09· cited 2×
• Stevens v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-01-04· cited 2×
• Dukes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-01· cited 1×
• Wyatt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-03· cited 1×
• State v. Zataar
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1991-04-09
• Hearn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-11
• Koppenhoefer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-09

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Clinger v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-11-10· cited 14×