Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute requires the State to prove one prior DWI conviction in the ten-year period
• holding that the statute requires the State to prove one prior DWI conviction in the ten-year period
• holding that the statute requires the State to prove one prior DWI conviction in the ten-year period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Getts v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-01-26· cited 130×
• Bower v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-05-31· cited 17×
• Uriega v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2004-03-10· cited 10×
• Weaver v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2001-09-14· cited 7×
• Smith v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-03-24· cited 6×
• Gordon v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-03-09· cited 4×
• Fernando Castillo v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-09-13· cited 1×
• Bower, David A. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-05-31
• Jimmie Gene Hindman v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-05-03
• Frank D. Crowley v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-09-12
• Rudy Garza Pena v. State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2002-04-24
• Getts, Bobby Doyle
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-01-26

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Renshaw v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1999-02-03· cited 25×