Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 3 S.W.3d 712
  • 68 Ark. App. 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming a conviction when appellant’s home contained all but one of the necessary components and appellant had expected the arrival of the missing ingredient and had begun the cooking process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stroud, Robbins, Jennings

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.