Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 718 S.W.2d 475
  • 19 Ark. App. 188
  • 1986 Ark. App. LEXIS 2493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that in cases where the State has other means of proving an issue, the balance is tipped in favor of inflammatory evidence being excluded because of the prejudicial effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cloninger, Cracraft, Mayfield, Corbin, Wright, Glaze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.