Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the express inclusion of one thing in a statute implies the exclusion of its opposite
• holding that section 921.143(1) did not bar the sentencing court from hearing testimony from the victim’s mother and sister, even though the text of the statute states that a court “shall permit” such testimony only if the victim is a minor or dead

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rhea v. District Board of Trustees
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-13· cited 21×
• Dickie v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-08· cited 7×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• Ring v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
• Gardner v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1977-03-22· cited 1,935×
• Proffitt v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 1,798×
• In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-01-29· cited 102×
• Markert v. Johnston
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1978-12-21· cited 66×
• Cashatt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-26· cited 52×
• Industrial Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Kwechin
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-12-01· cited 25×
• State v. Raymond
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-06-30· cited 25×
• Rivera v. Singletary
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-02-19· cited 20×
• Military Park Fire Control Tax District v. DeMarois
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-12-23· cited 13×
• Yisrael v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-07-10· cited 12×