Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 451 S.W.2d 716
  • 2 Tenn. Crim. App. 117
  • 1969 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the generally approved rule is that the unexplained possession of recently stolen goods may warrant an inference that the possessor has stolen them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, Galbreath, Oliver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.