Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 21 So. 3d 72
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15169
  • 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2058

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there is a limited exception to the rule where a represented defendant’s pro se motion is based on allegations of an adversarial relationship between defendant and counsel
  • holding that there is a limited exception to the rule where a represented defendant’s pro se motion is based on allegations of an adversarial relationship between defendant and counsel
  • finding that the appellant’s allegation that he was unable to review the evidence against him 2 failed to allege an adversarial relationship because it did not assign blame to defense counsel
  • trial court’s failure to hold limited hearing under Sheppard v. State, 17 So.3d 275 (Fla.2009) on defendant’s pro se motion to withdraw plea is harmless error where record conclusively refutes allegations supporting the motion
  • trial court’s failure to hold limited hearing under Sheppard v. State, 17 So. 3d 275 (Fla. 2009) on defendant’s pro se motion to withdraw plea is harmless error where record conclusively refutes allegations supporting the motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster, Davis, Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.