Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a trial court’s error in thinking that a certain sentence was statutorily mandated could have been harmless if “the trial judge [had] indicated that he would have” imposed the same sentence “regardless of what he believed the statute required”
• explaining that a trial court’s error in thinking that a certain sentence was statutorily mandated could have been harmless if “the trial judge [had] indicated that he would have” imposed the same sentence “regardless of what he believed the statute required”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hampton v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-10-02· cited 46×
• Hwang v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-10-03· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bradshaw v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-04-12· cited 20×
• Blevins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-11-09· cited 14×
• Law v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-04-17· cited 1×