Court of Appeals of Georgia· 7/14/1989
Smith v. State
Citations
- 386 S.E.2d 370
- 192 Ga. App. 604
- 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 1131
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because a defendant's discharge and acquittal occurs by operation of law at the close of the last term at which he could be timely tried, the waiver of his demand at a subsequent term has no effect and does prevent discharge and acquittal when sought
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benham, Carley, Been, Banke, Birdsong, Sognier, Pope, McMurray, Beasley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Labovitz v. HopkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-07-13· cited 64×
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-03-19· cited 13×
- Nunnally v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-09-01· cited 11×
- Lusher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-07-13· cited 6×
- Ringo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-01-03· cited 3×
- LaRouche v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-07-13· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-03-15· cited 38×
- Thornton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1910-05-12· cited 17×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-12-01· cited 11×
- Bishop v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1912-07-02· cited 10×
- Bush v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-11-29· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.