Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 290 S.E.2d 43
  • 249 Ga. 228
  • 1982 Ga. LEXIS 1130

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing a situation where the verdict form entirely omitted “not guilty by reason of insanity,” and ultimately concluding that the placement of the judgment forms was not reversible error
  • because “mitigation” is a “word of common meaning,” it was “not error to fail to define it” in the jury charge
  • no error committed by trial court’s failing to define the word “mitigating” since mitigation is a word of common meaning and understanding
  • “mitigation” is a “word of common meaning,” which does not require further definition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weltner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.