Nevada Supreme Court· 12/20/1990
Smith v. State
Citations
- 802 P.2d 628
- 106 Nev. 781
- 1990 Nev. LEXIS 144
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that while “the board of pardons retains the power to commute a sentence of life without the possibility of parole to a sentence allowing for parole,” the “parole board [remains] subject to the restrictions of NRS 213.1099(4)(e
- explaining that while “the board of pardons retains the power to commute a sentence of life without the possibility of parole to a sentence allowing for parole,” the “parole board [remains] subject to the restrictions of NRS 213.1099(4)(e
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Davis v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1991-09-17· cited 82×
- Sechrest v. IgnacioNinth Circuit· 2008-12-05· cited 56×
- Sims v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 22×
- Sterling Atkins v. Jeremy BeanNinth Circuit· 2024-12-02· cited 6×
- Rogers v. McDanielD. Nevada· 2011-07-08
- Sechrest v. IgnacioNinth Circuit· 2008-12-04
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.