Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 285 S.E.2d 749
  • 160 Ga. App. 26
  • 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where defendant is charged with multiple counts of the same offense, and neither different set of facts nor different dates are alleged, only one conviction can stand
  • where defendant is charged with multiple counts of same offense, and neither different set of facts nor different dates are alleged, only one conviction can stand
  • where “the counts in the accusation are identical except for the dates alleged,” and the dates “were not made essential averments, only one conviction can stand”
  • where “the counts in the accusation are identical except for the dates alleged,” and the dates “were not made essential averments, only one conviction can stand”
  • where “the counts in the accusation are identical except for the dates alleged,” and the dates “were not made essential averments, only one conviction can stand”
  • where “the counts in the accusation are identical except for the dates alleged,” and the dates “were not made essential averments, only one conviction can stand”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shulman, Birdsong, Sognier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.