Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 641 S.E.2d 296
  • 283 Ga. App. 317
  • 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 242
  • 2007 Ga. App. LEXIS 47

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing revocation of probation when there was no non-hearsay testimony that items had been stolen
  • where evidence was non-probative hearsay and otherwise insufficient, trial court abused its discretion in revoking probation
  • where evidence was nonprobative hearsay and otherwise insufficient, trial court abused its discretion in revoking probation
  • revocation of probation was abuse of discretion where only evidence that air compressor in defendant’s possession had been stolen was officer’s hearsay testimony that victim told him it had been stolen
  • “Hearsay evidence has no probative value and is inadmissible in a probation revocation proceeding. Thus, such evidence is incapable of supporting a trial court’s findings whether or not objection was lodged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Blackburn, Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.