Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 542 N.W.2d 853
  • 1995 Iowa App. LEXIS 148
  • 1995 WL 788200

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding PCR applicant “cannot circumvent the effect of the three-year time bar by merely claiming the ineffective assistance of [PCR] counsel.”
  • holding applicant cannot circumvent the three-year time-bar by claiming ineffective assistance of counsel because grounds existed and could have been raised within the applicable time period
  • stating an applicant “cannot circumvent the three-year time-bar by claiming the ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel”
  • stating applicant could not “circumvent the three-year time-bar by claiming ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel”
  • “The legal and factual underpinnings of each of Smith’s claims were in existence during the three-year period and were available to be addressed in Smith’s appellate and postconviction proceedings.”
  • “The legal and factual underpinnings of each of Smith’s claims were in existence during the three-year period and were available to be addressed in Smith’s appellate and postconviction proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donielson, Sackett, Cady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.