Supreme Court of Florida· 1/22/1998
Smith v. State
Citations
- 708 So. 2d 253
- 1998 WL 19244
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding impartiality of tribunal was compromised where, in ex parte communication, prosecutor persuaded judge to change his mind about an order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mark James Asay v. State of Florida, SC16-102 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc. & SC16-628 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc.Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-12-22· cited 110×
- Commonwealth v. GroveSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-08-31· cited 98×
- Marek v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-07-16· cited 55×
- Riechmann v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-09-20· cited 35×
- Vencil v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-03· cited 3×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rose v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-05-28· cited 60×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-10-27· cited 55×
- Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-03-21· cited 26×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1987-10-22· cited 24×
- Smith v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-02-15· cited 10×
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-03· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.