Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court lacked jurisdiction to address revocation of probation as defendant had already served in excess of the six years permitted by governing youthful offender statute
• “[W]hen sentencing an accused as a youthful offender, a court may not impose a split sentence that exceeds six years in length.”
• “When imposing a sentence for a violation of probation, a court must provide credit for time previously served on probation when necessary to ensure that the total time served does not exceed the statutory maximum for the offense at issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Knite v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-28· cited 5×
• Edwards v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-01· cited 4×
• Badger v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-02· cited 4×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Summers
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-09-22· cited 82×
• Waters v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-08-31· cited 55×
• Bragg v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-28· cited 15×
• Wilson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-17· cited 4×